- One
block-level heat map
- 4 degrees Celsius
difference within individual blocks
- 2021-2025
Implementation timeline
Best suited for
This model is particularly relevant for cities facing rising temperatures, strong urban heat island effects and insufficient green infrastructure. It is especially applicable in southern Europe and other regions where heatwaves are becoming more frequent, intense and prolonged, putting pressure on health systems, infrastructure and vulnerable populations. It is also highly relevant for post-disaster recovery contexts, where reconstruction processes create a rare opportunity to integrate climate resilience from the outset. In such situations, rebuilding becomes a lever not only for recovery but also for long-term urban transformation.
Stakeholders' role
The model is based on a collaborative, multilevel governance approach. Local authorities lead planning and implementation, working closely with the EU Mission on Adaptation to Climate Change to ensure technical robustness and alignment with wider adaptation objectives.
Local stakeholders, including spatial planning departments, citizens, non-governmental organisations and academic institutions, actively contribute to shaping interventions. Their involvement ensures that solutions are context-specific, socially accepted and capable of delivering co-benefits across different groups. This shared governance structure strengthens legitimacy while improving the quality and durability of urban interventions.
Built-in scalable tools
The model is inherently scalable because it starts from a simple but powerful entry point: high-resolution heat mapping. This provides a clear, evidence-based foundation for identifying urban hotspots and prioritising interventions where they are most needed.
Its block-level design allows for gradual expansion rather than large-scale disruption. Cities can begin with pilot neighbourhoods to test and refine solutions before progressively extending interventions across wider urban areas. This phased approach reduces risk, builds local capacity and enables continuous learning.
Because both the diagnostic tool (heat mapping) and the intervention logic (modular greening) are transferable, the model can be adapted to different urban morphologies, governance systems and climate conditions without losing its core effectiveness.
Funding pathways
The model was financed through the Regilience+ project under the EU Mission on Adaptation to Climate Change, demonstrating how EU innovation and adaptation funding can support integrated urban resilience approaches.
Beyond initial project funding, the model is well positioned for replication through a mix of urban development, climate adaptation and cohesion policy instruments. Its clear co-benefits for health, energy efficiency and urban regeneration also make it attractive for blended financing approaches involving public budgets, EU programmes and potential private investment in green infrastructure.
